dinsdag 18 juni 2013

Back in business

Long time since my last blog. Had to work a lot on the good cause :) Just a message then to tell everyone I'm doing fine and the Torrivent project is still going strong. For interesting news and updates of last year, please see the facebook site.

Para mis amigos hispanohablantes: trabajé mucho el año pasado y no tuve mucho tiempo para escribir... Pero... Todavía existe el proyecto Torrivent y tengo muchas ganas de volver a verte! :)

DTL
 

maandag 28 mei 2012

The Image of the Conquest




Part one of a series about heroes and villains... What is the image people get?

vrijdag 23 maart 2012

The myth of the American nomad



Even if a lot of people now know that horses were introduced by the Europeans, and that the Hollywood Indian thus is NOT a authentic picture of how native peoples lived when Columbus arrived in the Caribbean, there still remains that romantic idea of wandering nomads, living in harmony with Mother Nature. Even among a lot of native peoples themselves. This is because of a lack of proper education and a focus on European and Europeanized pre-1500 history.
I can present this history in 5 phrases:

Man originated in Africa, wandered around the world, and, around 10.000 years before the birth of Christ, invented agriculture in the Middle East.

A good 5000 years later the first cities and states arose in that same area and civilization spread around the world reaching Old Greece around the year 1000 BC.

Things also happened in China and India but Greece is the founder of modern Western Civilization so we focus on that.

They developed true alphabetic writing and democracy, passed that over to Ancient Rome, which was later transformed into an empire that eventually took over Christianity, spreading this faith throughout Europe and beyond.

The new faith blossomed in the Middle Ages and was spread in the Renaissance by the big discoverers in the world like Columbus and Vasco da Gama.

The last 500 years are even easier:
Europe conquered America, had big wars about which Jesus was the best one, created new fabulous art styles and ways of thinking, established colonies in the east and thus controlled the whole sea trade around the world out of which eventually grew more and more competition between the European superpowers (mostly Spain, Portugal, France, Netherlands, England) that resulted in the reducing of Portugal, Spain, and in the end the Netherlands so that finally only France and England ruled the waves.

After the death of the French Sun King however, only England was left although they didn’t enjoy that for too long, being kicked out of North America by their own subjects which made France very proud again, trying once more to establish French power in Europe and failing to do so because of England and the new powers like Austria-Hungaria, the German empire and the Russian Czardom in the east.

Three more wars followed between the old and the new superpowers while in the mean time they conquered Africa, Asia and Australia, establishing the new democratic, free and civilized state of living we all enjoy today…

Happy end?

Of course not. Not only because this is a very simplistic version of European history, and also not because the dubious last phrase (which seem to imply that European colonization did only good to the other continents), but also, last but not least, because it IS ignoring the fact that North & South American history, African history, Asian and Australian history, is world history too.

World history that is ignored in most books in school, but also at the university. Even the internet is quite Eurocentric… (if you don’t believe this, check out Google Translate and count the amount of American, Australian, and African languages. And if you believe this is about numbers of speakers, just count the total amount of speakers of the following European languages used by Google Translate: Basque, Esperanto, Galician, Irish, Icelandic, Latin, Maltese & Welsh. Compare this to American languages like Quechua, Aymara & Guarani or African languages like Hausa, Wolof, and Amharic)

It might seem obvious that knowing something about Amerindian history is useful to North and South American people. Just like African history seems useful to African people. But even on those continents, very little is known and most history taught in schools is European history (although in the Americas it’s a lot worse than in Africa since the latter one is almost entirely independent of Europe and/or its descendants, while the Americas are almost entirely ruled by Neo European countries, most of them established in the 19th century)

But what about WORLD History? Should Europeans or Asians learn Amerindian, African, and Australian history? Did American Indians, Africans, or Aboriginal peoples in Australia and the Pacific have a large influence on world history, worth learning? Although most people won’t realize it, the simple answer to this question is YES. And the most simple answer to the question WHY then is “Because of these great European discoverers like Columbus and Da Gama”. They brought Europeans in contact with “The Other”, it was because of their voyages that modern day globalization is what it is. Europe is not an island. European peoples are not more or less unique than others. History shouldn’t be only about one continent, simply because nowadays we think that the world has been Europeanized or Westernized. Globalization is globalization because it covers the world. Without peoples, products, markets, cultures, religions, languages, economies, science, and inventions from other places than Europe, Europe would still be the tiny place it is. One of the great achievements of Europeans was to trade, communicate, work together, and share with other peoples on other continents. In this way Europeans learned from non-Europeans and taught to non-Europeans. Europeans globalized the world for the first time, but this was only possible TOGETHER with peoples from other continents. It is time we recognize this.

So, man originated in Africa, wandered around the word and started agriculture in the Middle East. And the Andes. And Mexico. And China. And the island of Papua. And India. And Western, and Eastern Africa. And eastern North America. Crops and civilizations spread around the world, not from one place, but from many.

Around 5000 years later the first complex societies arose, not only in the Middle East but also in Peru, Egypt, China, and India. Cities, organized religions, writing systems, pyramids, temples, and organized trade, and leadership appeared. Why first in these places? Nobody knows for sure although there are of course a lot of educated guesses. 

dinsdag 14 februari 2012

article about the Amazon, artículo sobre la Amazonia, artigo sob' a Amazônia


Once Hidden by Forest, Carvings in Land Attest to Amazon’s Lost World

By SIMON ROMERO

RIO BRANCO, Brazil — Edmar Araújo still remembers the awe.

Douglas Engle for The New York Times.
Geoglyphs, geometric designs carved into the earth, have become increasingly visible with the deforestation of the Amazon.


As he cleared trees on his family’s land decades ago near Rio Branco, an outpost in the far western reaches of the Brazilian Amazon, a series of deep earthen avenues carved into the soil came into focus.

“These lines were too perfect not to have been made by man,” said Mr. Araújo, a 62-year-old cattleman. “The only explanation I had was that they must have been trenches for the war against the Bolivians.”

But these were no foxholes, at least not for any conflict waged here at the dawn of the 20th century. According to stunning archaeological discoveries here in recent years, the earthworks on Mr. Araújo’s land and hundreds like them nearby are much, much older — potentially upending the conventional understanding of the world’s largest tropical rain forest.

The deforestation that has stripped the Amazon since the 1970s has also exposed a long-hidden secret lurking underneath thick rain forest: flawlessly designed geometric shapes spanning hundreds of yards in diameter.

Alceu Ranzi, a Brazilian scholar who helped discover the squares, octagons, circles, rectangles and ovals that make up the land carvings, said these geoglyphs found on deforested land were as significant as the famous Nazca lines, the enigmatic animal symbols visible from the air in southern Peru. “What impressed me the most about these geoglyphs was their geometric precision, and how they emerged from forest we had all been taught was untouched except by a few nomadic tribes,” said Mr. Ranzi, a paleontologist who first saw the geoglyphs in the 1970s and, years later, surveyed them by plane.

For some scholars of human history in Amazonia, the geoglyphs in the Brazilian state of Acre and other archaeological sites suggest that the forests of the western Amazon, previously considered uninhabitable for sophisticated societies partly because of the quality of their soils, may not have been as “Edenic” as some environmentalists contend.

Instead of being pristine forests, barely inhabited by people, parts of the Amazon may have been home for centuries to large populations numbering well into the thousands and living in dozens of towns connected by road networks, explains the American writer Charles C. Mann. In fact, according to Mr. Mann, the British explorer Percy Fawcett vanished on his 1925 quest to find the lost “City of Z” in the Xingu, one area with such urban settlements.

In addition to parts of the Amazon being “much more thickly populated than previously thought,” Mr. Mann, the author of “1491,” a groundbreaking book about the Americas before the arrival of Columbus, said, “these people purposefully modified their environment in long-lasting ways.”

As a result of long stretches of such human habitation, South America’s colossal forests may have been a lot smaller at times, with big areas resembling relatively empty savannas.

Such revelations do not fit comfortably into today’s politically charged debate over razing parts of the forests, with some environmentalists opposed to allowing any large-scale agriculture, like cattle ranching and soybean cultivation, to advance further into Amazonia.

Douglas Engle for The New York Times.
Pre-Columbian artifacts, found near some of the geoglyphs in Acre State, offer clues to their origin.


Scientists here say they, too, oppose wholesale burning of the forests, even if research suggests that the Amazon supported intensive agriculture in the past. Indeed, they say other swaths of the tropics, notably in Africa, could potentially benefit from strategies once used in the Amazon to overcome soil constraints. “If one wants to recreate pre-Columbian Amazonia, most of the forest needs to be removed, with many people and a managed, highly productive landscape replacing it,” said William Woods, a geographer at the University of Kansas who is part of a team studying the Acre geoglyphs.

“I know that this will not sit well with ardent environmentalists,” Mr. Woods said, “but what else can one say?”

While researchers piece together the Amazon’s ecological history, mystery still shrouds the origins of the geoglyphs and the people who made them. So far, 290 such earthworks have been found in Acre, along with about 70 others in Bolivia and 30 in the Brazilian states of Amazonas and Rondônia.

Researchers first viewed the geoglyphs in the 1970s, after Brazil’s military dictatorship encouraged settlers to move to Acre and other parts of the Amazon, using the nationalist slogan “occupy to avoid surrendering” to justify the settlement that resulted in deforestation.

But little scientific attention was paid to the discovery until Mr. Ranzi, the Brazilian scientist, began his surveys in the late 1990s, and Brazilian, Finnish and American researchers began finding more geoglyphs by using high-resolution satellite imagery and small planes to fly over the Amazon.

Denise Schaan, an archaeologist at the Federal University of Pará in Brazil who now leads research on the geoglyphs, said radiocarbon testing indicated that they were built 1,000 to 2,000 years ago, and might have been rebuilt several times during that period.

Initially, Ms. Schaan said, researchers, pondering the 20-foot depth of some of the trenches, thought they were used to defend against attacks. But a lack of signs of human settlement within and around the earthworks, like vestiges of housing and trash piles, as well as soil modification for farming, discounted that theory. Researchers now believe that the geoglyphs may have held ceremonial importance, similar, perhaps, to the medieval cathedrals in Europe. This spiritual role, said William Balée, an anthropologist at Tulane University, could have been one that involved “geometry and gigantism.”

Still, the geoglyphs, located at a crossroads between Andean and Amazonian cultures, remain an enigma.

They are far from pre-Columbian settlements discovered elsewhere in the Amazon. Big gaps also remain in what is known about indigenous people in this part of the Amazon, after thousands were enslaved, killed or forced from their lands during the rubber boom that began in the late 19th century.

For Brazil’s scientists and researchers, Ms. Schaan said, the earthworks are “one of the most important discoveries of our time.” But the repopulation of this part of the Amazon threatens the survival of the geoglyphs, after being hidden for centuries.

Forests still cover most of Acre, but in cleared areas where the geoglyphs are found, dirt roads already cut through some of the earthworks. People live in wooden shacks inside others. Electricity poles dot the geoglyphs. Some ranchers use their trenches as watering holes for cattle.

“It’s a disgrace that our patrimony is treated this way,” said Tiago Juruá, the author of a new book here about protecting archaeological sites including the earthworks.

Mr. Juruá, a biologist, and other researchers say the geoglyphs found so far are probably just a sampling of what Acre’s forests still guard under their canopies. After all, they contend that outside of modern cities, fewer people live today in the Amazon than did before the arrival of Europeans five centuries ago.

“This is a new frontier for exploration and science,” Mr. Juruá said. “The challenge now is to make more discoveries in forests that are still standing, with the hope that they won’t soon be destroyed.”

Lis Horta Moriconi contributed reporting from Rio de Janeiro.

Fonte: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/world/americas/land-carvings-attest-to-amazons-lost-world.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&emc=eta1 (14/01/2012)

dinsdag 20 september 2011

lecture on the 19th of October 2011 at Leiden Univ


Charles C. Mann (19th of October 2011)

writer of 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus will give a lecture on the 19th of October 2011 about his newest book with special thanks to Publisher Nieuw Amsterdam and the Faculty of Archaeology.

1493: Uncovering the New World Columbus Created


Having resurrected the isolated splendors of the pre-Columbian Americas in his bestselling 1491, Mann explores the global convergences--and upheavals--inaugurated by their discovery in this fascinating survey of the "Homogenocene" era. Mann traces the subtle, epochal influences of the intercontinental "Columbian Exchange" of flora, fauna, commodities, and peoples, showing how European honeybees and earthworms remade New World landscapes; how New World corn, potatoes, and fertilizer ignited Eurasian population booms; how Old World diseases prompted an eruption of slavery in the Western Hemisphere (the influx of Africans, not Europeans, to the Americas, Mann notes, was the main demographic result of the Contact); how Latin American silver undermined China's Ming Dynasty; and how the decimation of Indian peoples changed the world's climate.

To get an impression of the book read The New York Times Review

Fore more detailed information please contact Dr. Alexander Geurds
071-527 2206 or a.geurds@arch.leidenuniv.nl


See: http://www.services-facilities.leiden.edu/studium-generale/activities/charles-c-mann.html

zaterdag 6 augustus 2011

1491

Het boek 1491 van Charles Mann gaat over de vraag hoe het Amerikaanse werelddeel er uit zag vlak voordat Columbus aankwam op de Bahama's.
http://www.charlesmann.org/Book-index.htm

Want Columbus kwam niet aan in Amerika. Als men met Amerika de Verenigde Staten bedoelt. Columbus is nooit in de Verenigde Staten geweest. Maar hij is in feite ook niet op de Bahama's geweest. Want de Bahama's bestonden in die tijd natuurlijk nog niet.

Sterker, Amerika als continent bestond natuurlijk nog niet. Maar Europa ook niet. In Europa zag men zichzelf vooral als Christenheid. En de Oost-Europeanen waren wel Christelijk maar wel verdacht enigszins verdacht (Grieks-Orthodox).    

zondag 26 juni 2011

woensdag 27 april 2011

Ecuador

Science 26 November 2010: 
Vol. 330 no. 6008 pp. 1170-1171 
DOI: 10.1126/science.330.6008.1170
  • NEWS FOCUS
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY

The Fight for Yasuni

Figure
View larger version:
    Protected park. 
    Beneath this forest canopy lies a record-setting number of species.
    CREDIT: © BEJAT MCCRACKEN, BEJAT.COM
    In 1997, 25 years after the first of many childhood canoe trips with his father down Ecuador's lower Napo River to the Limoncocha Biological Reserve, David Romo returned to find the site trashed beyond recognition. Once a pristine habitat fiercely defended by indigenous hunter-gatherers known as Waorani, the reserve had been overrun by a settlement of farmers who had moved in after construction of an oil-access road. The Waorani were gone, and so were many of the species that had made up the reserve's acclaimed biodiversity. Nowhere were once-common birds such as the grey-winged trumpeters and harpy eagles. The colonists had decimated the lake's fish and caiman populations, and poaching and tree-cutting felled the last primary forest in the area. “The forest was completely destroyed,” Romo, a conservation biologist at Ecuador's San Francisco University of Quito, recounts with dismay.
    Not long after Romo's unhappy return, the lure of oil threatened to bring similar devastation farther south to Ecuador's Yasuni National Park and the adjoining Waorani Ethnic Reserve. In 1989, this 17,000-kilometer section of the Amazon Basin had been designated a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. But it also happens to sit atop Ecuador's second largest reserve of crude oil, a block of concessions collectively known as the Ishpingo Tambococha Tiputini (ITT) field. In 2003, that rich prize spurred plans to build a new oil-access road into the park, instilling fears of a repeat of what happened in Limoncocha. “I realized then that we needed to bolster our conservation efforts with good, credible science if we were to have any chance of saving Yasuni,” says Romo.

    MULTIMEDIA

    View a slideshow of Yasuni's diverse species.
    Over the past decade, he and more than 50 other biologists working in the area have documented Yasuni's remarkable biodiversity, providing evidence that its forest has the highest number of species on the planet, including an unprecedented core where there are overlapping world richness records for amphibians, reptiles, bats, and trees. And after helping to form a group called Scientists Concerned for Yasuni, Romo and his colleagues have waged an international campaign to protect the location.
    This unabashed science-based advocacy has had an impact. In 2005, the year after the group published a preliminary analysis of Yasuni's biodiversity and recommended its protection, Ecuador's government rejected further road-building inside the park. Two years later, Ecuador President Rafael Correa went even further, offering a proposal in which his country would, in exchange for several billion dollars, keep the ITT oil permanently under ground in order to protect the park and to fight global warming. Industrialized countries would essentially pay to keep the park's oil-derived carbon in the ground.
    After several years of political negotiations and drama, the innovative initiative took a significant step toward reality this summer when the United Nations agreed to oversee a trust fund paid to Ecuador for the project. If all goes according to plan, the initiative may serve as a model for preserving intact biodiversity in other oil-rich portions of the western Amazon. But that's a big “if”: President Correa has vowed to allow drilling if the international community fails to compensate Ecuador sufficiently.

    Finding “megadiversity”

    The magnitude of Yasuni's species richness first became evident in 1992 when the Maxus oil company hired botanists to salvage plant specimens during construction of a new road entering the northwest section of the park, which borders Colombia and Peru. It was a thrilling and yet exceedingly difficult task, recalls Nigel Pitman, a tropical biologist at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, who in 1999 completed an inventory of 1500 different species of trees. “Getting familiar with the trees can take years,” says Pitman, “and even then it means making up your own names for the dozens of species that are new to science. … It isn't even diversity any longer—it's hyperdiversity, or megadiversity.”
    But if field inventories were beginning to reveal the forest's extreme diversity, no one in the 1990s was synthesizing the voluminous, unwieldy mass of independently conducted plot-based studies into an overall picture of Yasuni's biodiversity. “People came to this area to do their research and left,” says Holger Kreft of the Georg-August University of Göttingen in Germany, who has found that among lowland forests, Yasuni holds the record for most species of epiphytes: plants that grow on plants. “There wasn't anything approaching a network of scientists.”
    That changed after 2003 when the Brazilian national oil company Petrobras announced plans for a new 54-kilometer road into an isolated section of the park that would give access to the ITT oil fields. It was already clear that the Maxus road had provided an entry point for people to colonize the forest and for illegal logging in the park's northwest section, says ecologist Matt Finer, whose Yasuni postdoctoral research quickly shifted to campaigning once he discovered little if any organized opposition to Petrobras's new plans.
    To conservation biologist Margot Bass, the announcement by Petrobras, one of the largest companies in the world, seemed like an irrevocable death sentence for Yasuni park. “I despaired,” says Bass, an executive director of Finding Species, a small environmental group, who had worked in the park in the late 1990s.
    Nevertheless, she and Finer, now with the Washington, D.C.–based environmental group Save America's Forests, rallied together a who's who of leading tropical ecologists, organizing a 2-day conference in October 2004 at which attendees detailed the biodiversity significance of Yasuni and illustrated how the previous Maxus road had spurred deforestation. The researchers followed up with intense lobbying. “This was not pure science,” says Luis Suarez, head of Conservation International's Ecuador office, who was not part of the group. “They decided to take a position and produce not only a scientific paper but also write letters, give presentations, and basically put Yasuni on the agenda.”
    Despite scientific and legal challenges, Petrobras began road construction and was on the verge of entering the park when, at the end of April 2005, President Lucio Gutierrez was deposed after massive protests of his plans to revamp Ecuador's Supreme Court. By July, the new government had revoked the oil company's permit for the road. Soon thereafter, President Correa stepped forward with his ITT proposal. “We kept so much heat on the issue that it gave bigger and better funded organizations time to try and put together a really systematic plan for the region,” says Bass.

    A Copenhagen setback

    In the 3 years since Correa floated the Yasuni trust fund plan, oil exploration has progressed nearby—in eastern Ecuador and across the border in southwest Colombia and northern Peru—and scientists working at Tiputini Biodiversity Station, one of two university-affiliated research stations in the park, say it's as if an unstoppable force is closing in. “Tiputini is still very remote,” says Christian Voigt, an animal behavioral physiologist, “but you can hear the generator of an oil platform from a few kilometers' distance, and at night you can see the glow of the gas flame.”
    Yasuni's advocates have pressed on with amassing proof of its biodiversity riches, hoping such data will persuade the international community to pay for the park's protection. In January, Bass, Finer, Kreft, Pitman, and their colleagues published a data-rich, collaborative analysis in PLoS ONE that confirmed the existence within Yasuni of a so-called quadruple richness center. This 28,000-km2 plot encompasses peak species records for amphibians, birds, mammals, and tree communities. “Yasuni is probably unmatched by any other park in the world in total number of species. Both our species-distribution maps and our comprehensive analysis of existing field inventories support this finding,” says Bass.
    Figure
    View larger version:
      Make a deal. 
      If paid billions of dollars, Ecuador will prevent oil exploration in Yasuni.
      CREDIT: M. TWOMBLY/SCIENCE
      The area around the Tiputini station, for example, has smashed the world record for local amphibian diversity, with its 139 species far exceeding the 98 documented in Leticia, Colombia, the previous record-holder. And for insects, Yasuni's estimated 100,000 species per hectare represents the highest biodiversity, per unit area, in the world for any taxonomic group.
      Those who have made Yasuni their research home, and their mission, expected that Correa's initiative would get off the ground at the Copenhagen climate summit last December. But the Ecuadorian government questioned whether it had enough authority over the trust fund, and no deal was struck then, infuriating the country's environmental and scientific communities. “There was, already, Germany committing $50 million per year for 10 years,” an angry Romo recalled this spring, hands waving in the air. “We had letters of intent from at least five other countries—and now you say you want to go to OPEC and ask them for the money. That's betrayal!”
      Emotions have cooled since then, and in August Ecuador signed an agreement enacting the governance arrangements on a deal to keep Yasuni oil fields untapped in exchange for a minimum $3.6 billion in payments (about half the value of the oil if sold) from industrialized countries over the next 13 years. The United Nations Development Programme, which will oversee the trust fund, has suggested that the agreement could serve as a model for protecting ecosystems around the world.
      However, numerous questions about the effort remain, particularly in regards to the composition of the government-dominated board tasked with dispensing the trust fund's monies for conservation and reforestation projects, sustainable energy development, and livelihood-training programs for the local indigenous communities. There are fears, for example, that indigenous representatives will be excluded from the decision-making process.
      The biggest uncertainty remains funding. Chile has already committed $100,000, and Ecuador's vice president had said that Belgium, Spain, Turkey, and China have also offered money. But no official pledges from those countries have been announced, and in September, Germany signaled it was rethinking its vital commitment of nearly one-sixth of the needed total. If $100 million isn't paid into the United Nations fund by December 2011, Ecuador can refund any contributions—and analysts say Correa will then surely move to develop Yasuni's oil fields.
      Although he's nervous about whether the international community will fill the trust fund, Romo says he believes that the Yasuni researchers have so far succeeded in a way that cannot be ignored, providing justification for the region's continued conservation. “What caught the world's attention is the science,” says Romo. “But the clock is running and we cannot get distracted.”

      zaterdag 9 april 2011

      zondag 6 maart 2011

      Maya writing, escritura maya, L'écriture maya, escrita maia, Mayaschrift



      Introduction to Maya Hieroglyphs by Harri Kettunen & Christophe Helmke (Wayeb/Mesoweb 2010): http://www.mesoweb.com/resources/handbook/WH2010.pdf


      Introducción a los Jeroglíficos Mayas por Harri Kettunen & Christophe Helmke. Traducción al español: Verónica Amellali Vázquez López & Juan Ignacio Cases Martín: http://www.mesoweb.com/es/recursos/intro/JM2010.pdf


      Introduction aux Hiéroglyphes Mayas (Harri Kettunen, Christophe Helmke. Traduction française:
      Ramzy R. Barrois): http://www.mesoweb.com/resources/handbook/MG2010-Fr.pdf

      Brasil

      A court in Brazil has approved a controversial hydro-electric project in the Amazon rainforest, overturning an earlier ruling.
      Last week a judge blocked construction of the Belo Monte dam, saying it did not meet environmental standards.
      But a higher court on Thursday said there was no need for all conditions to be met in order for work to begin.
      Critics say the project threatens wildlife and will make thousands of people homeless.
      The Monte Belo dam is a cornerstone of President Dilma Rousseff's plan to upgrade Brazil's energy infrastructure.
      Controversial plan
      Licences still have to be granted for the actual building of the plant, but in January, Brazilian environment agency Ibama gave the go-ahead to clear land at the site.
      The government says the dam is crucial for development and will create jobs, as well as provide electricity to 23 million homes.
      The 11,000-megawatt dam would be the third biggest in the world - after the Three Gorges in China and Itaipu, which is jointly run by Brazil and Paraguay.
      It has long been a source of controversy, with bidding halted three times before the state-owned Companhia Hidro Eletrica do Sao Francisco was awarded the contract last year.
      Celebrities such as the singer Sting and film director James Cameron have joined environmentalists in their campaign against the project.
      They say the 6km (3.7 miles) dam will threaten the survival of a number of indigenous groups and could make some 50,000 people homeless, as 500 sq km (190 sq miles) of land would be flooded.
      Depois de, na semana passada, o projecto ter sido suspenso por um juiz, uma instância superior dá o “OK” para o início das obras daquela que vai ser a 3ª maior barragem do mundo e que tem gerado controvérsia por colocar em risco a Biodiversidade e vários grupos de indígenas.
      Aparentemente, as obras para a construção da mega-barragem na Amazónia que tinham sido suspensas por decisão de um juiz na semana passada, podem avançar, depois de um tribunal de uma instância superior ter anulado essa decisão, alegando que nem todos os requisitos ambientais têm de ser cumpridos
      A barragem de Belo Monte será o terceiro maior empreendimento hidroeléctrico do mundo e tem gerado controvérsia porque destruirá uma parte significativa da floresta da Amazónia afectando a Biodiversidade e vários grupos indígenas que habitam na região.
      O projecto, que surgiu nos anos 90 mas foi abandonado devido aos impactos ambientais, faz parte dos planos da Presidente Dlma Rousseff para modernizar a rede energética do Brasil e foi aprovado pelo IBAMA em Janeiro de 2010.
      Com uma potência associada de 11 mil MW, a barragem de Belo Monte fornecerá electricidade a 23 milhões de lares. Será instalada no Rio Xingu e implicará a submersão de 500Km2 de selva ao longo de 6Km.

      ------------

      Bouw omstreden megadam Amazonegebied gaat toch door

      Dankzij een Braziliaanse hogere rechtbank mag de bouw van ’s werelds derde grootste dam toch doorgaan. Het draaide een besluit van een rechter vorige week terug over het stilleggen van de bouw van een megadam in Altamira. 

      Er zou niet zijn voldaan aan 29 voorwaarden van natuurbehoud zoals het herstel van verontreinigde grond en het waarborgen van de bevaarbaarheid van rivieren. Maar de hoge rechter zegt nu dat er in elk geval mag worden doorgegaan met het vrijmaken van het stuk land dat nodig is bij de Xingu-rivier. Volgens hem is het op dit moment nog niet nodig dat aan alle voorwaarden wordt voldaan.

      De lokale bevolking is tegen de bouw van de waterkrachtcentrale omdat tienduizenden dakloos zouden worden. Maar de regering claimt dat de dam 23 miljoen huishoudens van stroom kan voorzien en voor veel werkgelegenheid zal zorgen. De dam kost 11 miljard dollar en produceert 11.000 megawatt produceren.